derek abdinor

online disclosure
mde
April 8, 2008

Shareholder activism and Motorola: (the billionaire way)

Author: derek - Categories: shareholder activism

Shareholder activists are not parka-wearing, be-bearded, placard-waving activists. By definition, they need to own and control shares. Unfortunately, retail investors being what they are, also means they wont get much clout at the AGM.

moto.gifIt helps if you’re a billionaire in charge of investment funds, and you aren’t happy the way that your investment is being managed. The mere whiff of a threat alone, can get them to accede to your demands for changes in management. They may even be forced to place your people on their board.

From BusinessWeek:

Motorola named Keith Meister, a managing director of Icahn investment funds, to its board and said it will nominate both him and fellow Icahn nominee William Hambrecht for director slots. The agreement virtually ensures that both will be elected at the company’s shareholder meeting next month.

Schaumburg, Ill.-based Motorola also will seek input from Icahn on the planned separation of its mobile devices operations and search for a chief executive for that business under the terms of the agreement.

Icahn agreed not to solicit proxies at the annual meeting, to dismiss litigation against the company and to vote his shares in support of all of the board’s director nominees.

April 2, 2008

PIC shows how it voted

Author: derek - Categories: governance, shareholder activism

The Public Investment Corporation (PIC) of South Africa released a PDF on its website on April 1, displaying how it voted at various AGMs.

PICThe PIC is tasked with investing the pension funds of government employees, and therefore tend to hold large chunks of equity in public companies. In fact, they hold over R700 billion assets under management, making them one of the largest investment managers in the country.

This powerful capital allows them to invest heavily in blue chips, and with it the concomitant power of having a say in how those organisations should be run. In early 2007 they held 17% of multinational Barloworld, which gave them a platform to vote against the re-election of Chairman Warren Clewlow. They put similar pressure on the board of Sasol, over transformation at executive level.

Most of their day-to-day voting decisions are against a perceived diluting of the PIC’s shareholding in the company at hand.

Read the document, fascinating read. A good study in the responsibilities of power. Well done on the disclosure document, a forum or blog on the PIC website would be an excellent addition.

Afrigator