derek abdinor

From an article in the Economist:

One reason why Germany’s biggest firms have not cut many jobs is its cherished model of stakeholder capitalism, which took root after the second world war and contributed to its rapid economic growth until the 1980s. Under this model, workers’ representatives fill half the seats on firms’ supervisory boards. A separate management board is responsible for running the business day to day. Companies are also required to act in the interest of all “stakeholders”, not just of shareholders.

That creates a tension between profits and jobs. A seminal, if dated, study is illustrative. It found that 83% of German managers surveyed in 1995 considered that the companies they worked for belonged to stakeholders rather than shareholders. Some 60% said that saving jobs was more important than paying dividends. In America and Britain, by contrast, almost 90% of managers said that paying dividends was more important than preserving jobs and 75% of managers felt that firms belonged to their shareholders.

Via Compliance Week:

Aircraft manufacturers, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT) , is conducting an online survey of stockholders on its executive compensation (remuneration) practices. Results will be reviewed by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of Lockhee’s Board of Directors.

Prudential (NYSE: PRU) has a section on their website where one can email the independent directors (an email address going to all of them, interesting!) to make comment on pay practices. Its not indicated how these results will be audited or reported on.

What I like about is the effort that is being made, as well identifying the role of the independent directors and the implication of their resposibilities.

From the Institute of Charted Accountants (Scotland):

ICAS objects to the additional burdens, costs and risks of this during the current recession – when many businesses are struggling to survive and should be concentrating their management expertise on the much more pressing and important task of maintaining productivity and employment.

Donald Drysdale, Assistant Director at ICAS and a Chartered IT Professional, said:

“In his Review of HMRC Online Services, Lord Carter of Coles recommended the use of XBRL, but emphasised that the new standard should not be imposed until it had been implemented and had bedded down. He also noted that other improvements would be needed before the service would meet the needs of tax agents.

“Many companies won’t be ready for this. It is absurd to require businesses struggling during a recession to introduce this. XBRL has been used relatively sparingly to date, and HMRC plans to adopt Inline XBRL (or iXBRL) would be the first large-scale iXBRL implementation worldwide, so the technology certainly hasn’t been adequately tried, tested and proven to be reliable. It falls far short of Lord Carter’s criteria.”

ICAS has been exploring this topic with HMRC for more than two years. The Institute was instrumental in establishing tripartite discussions among Government, the tax profession and software vendors, but now reports widespread concerns that software solutions for preparing iXBRL-based statutory accounts will not be available in time.

Drysdale added:

“It’s misguided and disproportionate to mandate iXBRL-based online filing by all companies as early as April 2011.
We’ve urged HMRC to reconsider its plans in the light of the relatively immature market position of XBRL, and we’ve asked that Ministers shift to a gradual voluntary adoption of iXBRL filing until the new software for tax and accounts preparation has been properly tried and tested.”