From The Telegraph 19 Nov 2009: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/shares/6588959/How-to-buy-shares-with-perks.html

How to buy shares with perks

Consumers can gain benefits ranging from thousands of pounds off the price of a new home to a 30pc discount on Eurotunnel travel just for holding shares in certain companies.

Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for ‘global collapse’

Société Générale has advised clients to be ready for a possible “global economic collapse” over the next two years, mapping a strategy of defensive investments to avoid wealth destruction.

In discussion the other day we were puzzled as to why the majority of companies on the JSE do not take advantage of Schedule 23 for their regulatory communications to the market and shareholders.

For issuing companies to embark on an electronic consent program, the following benefits accrue to company and shareholder:

1. Email addresses of shareholders for direct communication
2. Mobile numbers and landline numbers if proffered
3. Reduced printing and mailing costs
4. More cash in the kitty for dividends or retained earnings
5. Saving the planet
6. Training your shareholders to come to your official website as the #1 source of fact, news and comment

There are even more reasons to clean up one’s share register, embark on an asset reunification project  (tidying up unclaimed dividends) and ALL of them do credit to your brand. How you choose to spin it, be it by planting a tree for every shareholder converted or a reporting unit in your sustainability report, is up to you.

In South Africa, where public monies are involved, its always only a matter of time before the issue becomes politicised.

<pause for effect>

It follows that employing good shareholder communication governance NOW is better than having industrial action in a few months or years, at your AGM or outside your glass doors.

Via Twitter. Link to full article

Essentially, IRIS did a survey on the financials of 1500 Indian public companies. Discrepancies appeared in over 200 of them; figure differences as opposed to accounting interpretations.

One of the outcomes of the survey was to highlight the effect that XBRL will have in bringing such problems to light, and ultimately, to bring them in line.

In more XBRL-as-Superman news,  UBMatrix has a paper on how XBRL will help track TARP spending.

Two codes of corporate governance have ruled informed public companies in the last 15 years in South Africa – the King codes.

The third code was launched in Johannesburg last week for public review – you can view it here.

Some interesting points:

• shareholders ought to approve remuneration, and an annual remuneration report needs to be published
• the audit committee to be appointed by shareholders
• a Chief Risk Officer to be mooted
• Sustainability reporting should be an ongoing process
• the majority of the board should be non-executive; the majority of that being independent.

I must observe with unjaundiced eye that South African companies, notably the blue-chips, do adhere to the King recommendations. As it is a widely used benchmark, it is expected to come across in the company’s annual report. No self-respecting company secretary could pretend not to know about King and the recommendations.

It seems some of the proposals in the draft review are to be found between what is happening in the developed world and the new South African Companies Act, also fermenting in legal and regulatory circles.

The King II Code of Corporate Governance, which  recommends good practices for listed entities in South Africa, has always been in favour of companies having non-executive representation on the boards as well as the committees of listed companies. The reasoning behind these recommendation went as follows:

• non-executives are relatively impartial
• they bring different expertise and strategic input, being seperate from the operational running of the company
• they should be in the majority on the remuneration and audit committees in order to represent shareholder interests 

PWC brought out the Non-Executive Directors Best Practices and Fees Report which was of far more pertinence in 2009 than in any other time.  Amid bailouts in developed countries and exorbitant remuneration, non-executives are either being looked to highlight problems or to shape up their own accountability.  That aside, in this country a professional non-executive director is a full-time career.

As an afterthought, why do boards get ‘remunerated’ and ‘compensated’ for their time, whilst workers get ‘wages’ or a ’salary’?

It’s here: the mandate for XBRL to become an official filing process, alongside EDGAR, for listed companies in the US. 

The SEC announced this in a long-awaited roundtable today, 17 December 2008.  The IDEA system was launched today too. This has followed on the completion of the US GAAP taxonomies. 

Immediate impact: 
Companies that are listed in the US (even foreign-owned) will have to begin a process of filing in XBRL in addition to current EDGAR requirements. It will not replace EDGAR at first, and will have to be placed on the company website (if it has one). Mutual funds will have to do same for risk-return summaries.

This is a phased approach, beginning with companies with a worldwide float of over US$ 5 billion and a december year -end. There will be limited liability, the same as in the voluntary filing program. If you satisfy these requirements, talk to your EDGAR vendor tomorrow.

The big picture
XBRL software vendors will see some consolidation in the market; I believe an influx of developers from the consumer-centric web 2.0 world  may find that XBRL combines their aspirations of mashups and service oriented achitecture, and financial analysis apps will experience a steep innovation curve.

At the same time, SAP and other ERP vendors will escalate XBRL within their products, for internal analysis and risk management presented in visual fashions.

Foreign markets will see the world’s biggest endorsing XBRL unconditionally, and rush to complete their taxonomies.

There is likely to be too much credit given to XBRL in the early , pre-and post inauguration days: it is not a panacea, but currently it looks like the best idea going. The ultimate aim, though never stated, is 24-7 disclosure: from the General Ledger to the markets

After weeks of speculation and false starts, it became clear that this would be a political decision. The lack of oversight in Wall Street and Washington is clearly an ethical and governance issue, but it has become clear that XBRL could go a long way to allow for better analysis, rapid decisions and early warning systems. It may not be the sherriff, but it’s the sherriff’s mustang.